Your message dated Thu, 8 Apr 2004 18:54:44 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#242763: www.debian.org: Several WNPP/RFA links are not (no 
longer?) valid
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 8 Apr 2004 16:13:39 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Apr 08 09:13:39 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from mrelay3.uni-hannover.de [130.75.2.41] (root)
        by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
        id 1BBc9q-0004gG-00; Thu, 08 Apr 2004 09:13:39 -0700
Received: from mail.itp.uni-hannover.de (mail.itp.uni-hannover.de 
[130.75.25.242])
        by mrelay3.uni-hannover.de (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id 
i38GDXv9020107
        for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Thu, 8 Apr 2004 18:13:33 +0200 (MEST)
Received: from pleione.itp.uni-hannover.de (pleione.itp.uni-hannover.de 
[130.75.25.99])
        by mail.itp.uni-hannover.de (Postfix) with ESMTP
        id 97DD6C0F2; Thu,  8 Apr 2004 18:13:28 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by pleione.itp.uni-hannover.de (Postfix, from userid 237)
        id 4FF3B5F22; Thu,  8 Apr 2004 18:13:28 +0200 (CEST)
From: Helge Kreutzmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: www.debian.org: Several WNPP/RFA links are not (no longer?) valid
X-Mailer: reportbug 1.50
Date: Thu, 08 Apr 2004 18:13:28 +0200
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.39
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
        autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level: 
X-CrossAssassin-Scores: 1

Package: www.debian.org
Version: N/A; reported 2004-04-08
Severity: normal

On "http://www.debian.org/devel/wnpp/work_needing";
several packets are listed, where the links are not valid, i.e.
firebird yields:
http://packages.debian.org/cgi-bin/search_packages.pl?searchon=names&version=all&exact=1&keywords=firebird

"Can't find that package."

Other examples:
libffm and libflash

Either packages.debian.org needs to be fixed to display those, or the
links/entries have to be removed.

-- System Information
Debian Release: 3.0
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux pleione 2.4.22-grsec #1 Thu Jan 8 12:44:10 CET 2004 i686
Locale: LANG=en_US, LC_CTYPE=en_US


---------------------------------------
Received: (at 242763-done) by bugs.debian.org; 8 Apr 2004 16:55:11 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Apr 08 09:55:11 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from mail.sorgfalt.net [217.160.169.191] 
        by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
        id 1BBco3-0003mW-00; Thu, 08 Apr 2004 09:55:11 -0700
Received: from p50839c53.dip.t-dialin.net ([80.131.156.83] helo=djpig.djpig.de)
        by mail.sorgfalt.net with asmtp 
        (Cipher TLSv1:DES-CBC3-SHA:168) (Exim 3.35 (Sorgfalt))
        id 1BBcnw-0008S5-00
        for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Thu, 08 Apr 2004 18:55:10 +0200
Received: from djpig by djpig.djpig.de with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
        id 1BBcnf-00084z-00
        for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Thu, 08 Apr 2004 18:54:47 +0200
Date: Thu, 8 Apr 2004 18:54:44 +0200
From: Frank Lichtenheld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Bug#242763: www.debian.org: Several WNPP/RFA links are not (no 
longer?) valid
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i
Sender: Frank Lichtenheld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
        autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level: 
X-CrossAssassin-Scores: 1

On Thu, Apr 08, 2004 at 06:13:28PM +0200, Helge Kreutzmann wrote:
> On "http://www.debian.org/devel/wnpp/work_needing";
> several packets are listed, where the links are not valid, i.e.
> firebird yields:
> http://packages.debian.org/cgi-bin/search_packages.pl?searchon=names&version=all&exact=1&keywords=firebird
> 
> "Can't find that package."
> 
> Other examples:
> libffm and libflash
> 
> Either packages.debian.org needs to be fixed to display those, or the
> links/entries have to be removed.

No, the corresponding wnpp bugs need to be closed. If you encounter such
problems feel free to close the corresponding bugs (after you checked
the packages are indeed removed) or just wait until someone from -qa
cleans up the bug list.

Gruesse,
-- 
Frank Lichtenheld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
www: http://www.djpig.de/

Reply via email to