Your message dated Mon, 9 Feb 2004 12:53:17 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#223849: vote.debian.org: bad redirect
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 13 Dec 2003 09:01:19 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Dec 13 03:01:18 2003
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from dhcp065-026-182-085.indy.rr.com (redwald.deadbeast.net) 
[65.26.182.85] 
        by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
        id 1AV4w6-0006Kk-00; Sat, 13 Dec 2003 02:15:38 -0600
Received: by redwald.deadbeast.net (Postfix, from userid 1000)
        id B52DA640D4; Sat, 13 Dec 2003 03:15:37 -0500 (EST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: vote.debian.org: bad redirect
X-Mailer: reportbug 2.37
Date: Sat, 13 Dec 2003 03:15:37 -0500
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 
        2.60-master.debian.org_2003_11_25-bugs.debian.org_2003_12_11 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on master.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=4.0 tests=HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no 
        version=2.60-master.debian.org_2003_11_25-bugs.debian.org_2003_12_11
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: www.debian.org
Severity: normal

<URL: http://vote.debian.org/ > redirects to <URL:
http://www.debian.org/distrib/ftplist >.

It should redirect to <URL: http://www.debian.org/vote/ >.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: powerpc
Kernel: Linux redwald 2.4.22-powerpc #1 Sat Oct 25 16:59:03 EST 2003 ppc
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C


---------------------------------------
Received: (at 223849-done) by bugs.debian.org; 9 Feb 2004 11:53:44 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Feb 09 03:53:44 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from biedermanns.com (mail.biedermanns.com) [213.133.98.83] (mail)
        by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
        id 1Aq9yy-0004qv-00; Mon, 09 Feb 2004 03:53:44 -0800
Received: from alfie-vivi.sil.at ([62.116.31.58] helo=tausendmorgenwald)
        by mail.biedermanns.com with asmtp 
        (Cipher TLSv1:DES-CBC3-SHA:168) (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
        id 1Aq9y3-0005Cn-00; Mon, 09 Feb 2004 12:52:47 +0100
Received: from alfie by tausendmorgenwald with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
        id 1Aq9yX-0001Gv-00; Mon, 09 Feb 2004 12:53:17 +0100
Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2004 12:53:17 +0100
From: Gerfried Fuchs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Bug#223849: vote.debian.org: bad redirect
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
        protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="QTprm0S8XgL7H0Dt"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mail-Copies-To: nobody
X-Editor: Vi Improved <http://www.vim.org/>
X-Signature-Color: cyan
X-Signature-Prg: sigd/0.10.4 (Perl) <http://alfie.ist.org/projects/sigd/>
X-Face: "`Q5\Ix+YG'{KDq<>5mcZL8Sp7$[L|%#^MSk'{Qpp"J8.<RP*P9<{{6$8%_~*:6c{)<;e:s 
!:C2%IH-5:GT<,Sf3Xx}di,JDbDRH/;-eb{n`VSi*}-R2,[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
{3w}E7d}+GN<|v=gDc;.c(xiy{Og_=2cy)T1J"Lu}y6Onsr
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.5.1+cvs20040105i
Sender: Gerfried Fuchs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_02_01 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no 
        version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_02_01
X-Spam-Level: 


--QTprm0S8XgL7H0Dt
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

* Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-12-13 03:15]:
> <URL: http://vote.debian.org/ > redirects to <URL:
> http://www.debian.org/distrib/ftplist >.
>=20
> It should redirect to <URL: http://www.debian.org/vote/ >.

 I guess it must have been an oversight during the reconstruction of the
services after the breakin -- it is working now as expected (don't know
for how long though).

 Have fun,
Alfie
--=20
<LnxBil> Alfie: Also gehen tut das Ding, die Fehler sehe ich doch beim star=
ten?
                -- LnxBil =FCber die Bedeutung von "use strict;"

--QTprm0S8XgL7H0Dt
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFAJ3SsMU96lewVKUIRAssUAJ9RzfjCdyq8DcKWIX09/W9QpAcTYgCbBFyH
JbZfzIV9OJ635owMkZfa8Ow=
=BK86
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--QTprm0S8XgL7H0Dt--

Reply via email to