Your message dated Thu, 5 Feb 2004 19:45:58 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Seems fixed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 8 Apr 1999 18:40:48 +0000
Received: (qmail 15245 invoked from network); 8 Apr 1999 18:40:48 -0000
Received: from sarg.ryerson.ca ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
by master.debian.org with SMTP; 8 Apr 1999 18:40:48 -0000
Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
by sarg.Ryerson.CA (8.8.7/8.8.7) id OAA16115;
Thu, 8 Apr 1999 14:40:02 -0400
Date: Thu, 8 Apr 1999 14:40:02 -0400
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Authentication-Warning: sarg.Ryerson.CA: cmwilson set sender to [EMAIL
PROTECTED] using -f
From: Mike Wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Searching by description searches too much
Package: www.debian.org
I used the Search Package Directories search utility at
http://www.debian.org/distrib/packages with Search on: Descriptions
to look for `logo'.
It appears that every package is a match, despite not having
the word `logo' visible anywhere.
Perhaps it's matching `alt="[Debian Logo]"' in the html source for
each page?
Mike
--
Mike Wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED] Debian GNU/Linux!
senseitachi wa boku wo fuan ni suru kedo
sore hodo taisetsuna kotoba wa nakatta
--The Blue Hearts [shounen no shi]
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 35765-done) by bugs.debian.org; 5 Feb 2004 18:46:06 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Feb 05 10:46:06 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from sorgfalt.net (mail.sorgfalt.net) [217.160.169.191]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1AooVq-0004hE-00; Thu, 05 Feb 2004 10:46:06 -0800
Received: from pd9530180.dip.t-dialin.net ([217.83.1.128] helo=djpig.djpig.de)
by mail.sorgfalt.net with asmtp
(Cipher TLSv1:DES-CBC3-SHA:168) (Exim 3.35 (Sorgfalt))
id 1AooVp-0007M1-00
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Thu, 05 Feb 2004 19:46:05 +0100
Received: from djpig by djpig.djpig.de with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
id 1AooVj-0006xd-00
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Thu, 05 Feb 2004 19:45:59 +0100
Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2004 19:45:58 +0100
From: Frank Lichtenheld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Seems fixed
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i
Sender: Frank Lichtenheld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_02_01
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=4.0 tests=none autolearn=no
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_02_01
X-Spam-Level:
Hmm, don't know why this wasn't closed after installing the new
packages.d.o scripts. The search now works directly with the
Packages descriptions and not with the generated pages.
Gruesse,
--
Frank Lichtenheld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
www: http://www.djpig.de/
