Your message dated Thu, 15 Jan 2004 14:28:36 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#227517: packages.d.o: Links to sources of packages that
have security updates point to the wrong location
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 13 Jan 2004 20:25:11 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Jan 13 14:25:03 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from dialin-87221.ewetel.net (rain.florz.dyndns.org) [212.6.87.221]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1AgUeZ-0008NP-00; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 13:56:46 -0600
Received: from florz.florz.dyndns.org ([192.168.0.121])
by rain.florz.dyndns.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
id 1AgUe9-0005jt-00; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 20:56:17 +0100
Received: from florz by florz.florz.dyndns.org with local (Exim 3.35 #1
(Debian))
id 1AgUe8-00017l-00; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 20:56:16 +0100
From: Florian Zumbiehl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: packages.d.o: Links to sources of packages that have security updates
point to the wrong location
X-Mailer: reportbug 1.50
Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 20:56:16 +0100
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_01_13
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on master.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=4.0 tests=HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_01_13
X-Spam-Level:
Package: www.debian.org
Version: N/A; reported 2004-01-13
Severity: normal
I'm not totally sure as to whether this is globally true but I've
recently come across two packages (cupsys (IIRC) and bind) for
which this was true ...
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 227517-done) by bugs.debian.org; 15 Jan 2004 13:28:52 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Jan 15 07:28:52 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from sorgfalt.net (mail.sorgfalt.net) [217.160.169.191]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1Ah7YJ-0004dG-00; Thu, 15 Jan 2004 07:28:51 -0600
Received: from p50839f3f.dip.t-dialin.net ([80.131.159.63] helo=djpig.djpig.de)
by mail.sorgfalt.net with asmtp
(Cipher TLSv1:DES-CBC3-SHA:168) (Exim 3.35 (Sorgfalt))
id 1Ah7YI-00033H-00; Thu, 15 Jan 2004 14:28:51 +0100
Received: from djpig by djpig.djpig.de with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
id 1Ah7Y6-0001eZ-00; Thu, 15 Jan 2004 14:28:38 +0100
Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2004 14:28:36 +0100
To: Florian Zumbiehl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Bug#227517: packages.d.o: Links to sources of packages that have
security updates point to the wrong location
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i
From: Frank Lichtenheld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_01_14
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on master.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_01_14
X-Spam-Level:
On Tue, Jan 13, 2004 at 10:55:04PM +0100, Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
> tags 227517 pending
> thanks
>
> On Tue, Jan 13, 2004 at 08:56:16PM +0100, Florian Zumbiehl wrote:
> > Package: www.debian.org
> > Version: N/A; reported 2004-01-13
> > Severity: normal
> >
> > I'm not totally sure as to whether this is globally true but I've
> > recently come across two packages (cupsys (IIRC) and bind) for
> > which this was true ...
>
> The problem is known and already fixed in CVS. So this should go away
> soon.
Fixed.
Gruesse,
--
Frank Lichtenheld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
www: http://www.djpig.de/
