Your message dated Thu, 14 Oct 2004 12:07:40 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Seems fixed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 5 Oct 2004 15:46:57 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Oct 05 08:46:57 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from 82-200.surfsnel.dsl.internl.net (mickey.macfreek.nl) 
[145.99.200.82] 
        by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
        id 1CErWi-0003WI-00; Tue, 05 Oct 2004 08:46:56 -0700
Received: by mickey.macfreek.nl (Postfix, from userid 501)
        id 2932F4AAB0; Tue,  5 Oct 2004 17:47:03 +0200 (CEST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Freek Dijkstra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: packages.debian.org: bad links
X-Mailer: reportbug 2.63
Date: Tue, 05 Oct 2004 17:47:03 +0200
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
        autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: www.debian.org
Severity: important

The pages about the individual packages give 404 Not Found results.

For example, if you are looking for the gcc package, you go to
http://packages.debian.org/gcc, but when following the links labelled
"stable", "testing" or "unstable", e.g. to
http://packages.debian.org/stable/devel/gcc, you get a Not Found error.


-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (500, 'testing')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.4.18-686
Locale: LANG=en_GB, LC_CTYPE=en_GB

---------------------------------------
Received: (at 275047-done) by bugs.debian.org; 14 Oct 2004 10:08:17 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Oct 14 03:08:16 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from mail.lenk.info [217.160.169.191] (Debian-exim)
        by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
        id 1CI2Wu-00035a-00; Thu, 14 Oct 2004 03:08:16 -0700
Received: from mail.sorgfalt.net ([217.160.134.107])
        by mail.lenk.info with esmtp 
        (Cipher TLS-1.0:RSA_ARCFOUR_SHA:16) (Exim 4.34 1)
        id 1CI2bA-0004Pz-DY
        for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Thu, 14 Oct 2004 12:12:40 +0200
Received: from pd9e39c45.dip.t-dialin.net ([217.227.156.69] 
helo=feynman.djpig.de)
        by mail.sorgfalt.net with asmtp 
        (Cipher TLS-1.0:RSA_ARCFOUR_SHA:16) (Exim 4.34 1)
        id 1CI2YN-0000Jw-BK
        for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Thu, 14 Oct 2004 12:09:47 +0200
Received: from djpig by feynman.djpig.de with local (Exim 4.34)
        id 1CI2WK-0001bB-Is
        for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu, 14 Oct 2004 12:07:40 +0200
Date: Thu, 14 Oct 2004 12:07:40 +0200
From: Frank Lichtenheld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Seems fixed
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040722i
Sender: Frank Lichtenheld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DSBL 
        autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level: 

AFAICT, all outdated pages on püackages.debian.org should be fixed now.

Gruesse,
-- 
Frank Lichtenheld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
www: http://www.djpig.de/

Reply via email to