On Sat, 8 Nov 2003 10:12:31 -0500, James A Treacy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> On Sat, Nov 08, 2003 at 03:09:13PM +0100, Josip Rodin wrote:
>> On Thu, Oct 30, 2003 at 06:06:14PM -0700, Debian WWW CVS wrote:
>> > CVSROOT: /cvs/webwml Module name: webwml Changes by: srivasta
>> > 03/10/30 18:06:14
>> >
>> > Modified files:
>> > english/devel : constitution.wml
>> > Added files:
>> > english/devel : constitution.1.1.wml
>>
>> Why is it necessary to have N files for N versions?
>>
>> Maybe it's just me, but why can't the obsoleted versions of the
>> constitution be left in the CVS history (and other archive-like
>> places), rather than littering the devel/ directory?
> Having the old versions around could be useful to see how Debian has
> evolved over the years. I suggest putting the old versions in a
> subdirectory though.
I have no objections to moving superseded, but not redacted,
versions of the constitution and foundation documents to a subdir (as
long as the relevant links are updated).
manoj
--
I poured spot remover on my dog. Now he's gone. Steven Wright
Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <http://www.debian.org/%7Esrivasta/>
1024R/C7261095 print CB D9 F4 12 68 07 E4 05 CC 2D 27 12 1D F5 E8 6E
1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B 924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C
