On Fri, 2003-11-07 at 15:00, MJ Ray wrote: > On 2003-11-07 19:27:18 +0000 Alexander Winston > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > almost all professionally written works follow this style: "January 1, > > 2004." Are there objections to the latter? > > Yes. I think it should be "1st January 2004" or "2004, January 1".
I'm talking more about removing the ordinal suffixes, not revamping the entire date stamp.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
