On Wed, Jul 23, 2003 at 01:25:53AM +0200, Denis Barbier wrote: > On Wed, Jul 02, 2003 at 01:41:20AM +0200, Marcin Owsiany wrote: > > Package: www.debian.org > > Version: unavailable; reported 2003-07-02 > > Severity: minor > > > > Debconf templates' translation also seems to be coordinated through > > ddtp.d.o > > My own opinion is that the ddtp has several flaws, and until they > are fixed, I am not sure that translating via the DDTP is a good thing. > See http://lists.debian.org/debian-i18n/2003/debian-i18n-200302/msg00021.html > and other posts in this thread.
I agree with you here. Until (if) the DDTP really produces proper po's and it's just the same to do the translation through it or through CVS directly I will never recommend the DDTP for debconf template translation. Regards Javi
pgpnHeUtK0x41.pgp
Description: PGP signature
