On Wed, Apr 23, 2003 at 10:51:02AM +0100, Colin Watson wrote: > On Wed, Apr 23, 2003 at 10:20:48AM +0200, Josip Rodin wrote: > > On Wed, Apr 23, 2003 at 01:50:26AM +0200, Frank Lichtenheld wrote: > > > It's disk space against cpu usage. Clearly the first is much > > > cheaper. > > > > Perhaps I should also mention the exact cause of those 500 errors that > > was briefly mentioned on -www recently -- the MaxClients 300 setting > > on gluck exceeds the maxproc 256 setting. Of course, this is a bug, > > and it will be fixed, but this still means that apache on the machine > > often runs two hundred processes as it is, so adding more CGIs/PHPs > > wouldn't exactly be the happiest solution. > > Sane performance tuning strategies dictate that more stuff should be > in-process, then. Is mod_perl feasible?
Or libapache-mod-speedycgi if there's enough spare RAM available.
/me hides
--
Jose Carlos Garcia Sogo
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
pgpHBIUMEx4D4.pgp
Description: PGP signature
