Your message dated Sun, 13 Apr 2003 11:10:02 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug review
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 22 Jan 2003 11:11:19 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jan 22 05:11:18 2003
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from bonci.ne.client2.attbi.com (starlite.bonci.ne.client2.attbi.com)
[24.218.17.202]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 18bIms-0004GD-00; Wed, 22 Jan 2003 05:11:18 -0600
Received: from jaybonci by starlite.bonci.ne.client2.attbi.com with local (Exim
3.36 #1 (Debian))
id 18bEt9-0000Aj-00; Wed, 22 Jan 2003 02:01:31 -0500
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Jay Bonci <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: packages.d.o: DOM caching browsers lose place because of SELECTED in
drop-downs
X-Mailer: reportbug 2.10
Date: Wed, 22 Jan 2003 02:01:25 -0500
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Jay Bonci <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-BadReturnPath: [EMAIL PROTECTED] rewritten as [EMAIL PROTECTED]
using "From" header
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.1 required=5.0
tests=PGP_SIGNATURE,SPAM_PHRASE_00_01
version=2.41
X-Spam-Level:
Package: www.debian.org
Version: unavailable; reported 2003-01-22
Severity: minor
Tags: patch
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
When searching on:
http://www.debian.org/distrib/packages
Browsers that do DOM-caching (ala Internet Explorer) lose their search position
in the
dropdown if you hit back after searching. It's a minor annoyance associated
with the
way the SELECTED works in the browser. Items can be placed on top without
needlessly
enforcing a SELECTED, and items that are on the top do not need to force the
browser to override the user-selected state.
For instance. If I change the package selection from stable to unstable, after
I search
and hit back, I have to rechange it to stable.
Like I said, it's minor. A patch against the WML is included
--Jay Bonci
- -- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux starlite 2.4.19-686 #1 Mon Nov 18 23:59:03 EST 2002 i686
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQE+LkHFZNh5D+C4st4RAo/BAJ9B6aAN0usmEQdRSTH8OAaX/Vpm/gCfYOuv
JvJhzwXVKtyN5TRh8ADcOB4=
=JC8l
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 177870-done) by bugs.debian.org; 13 Apr 2003 09:10:10 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Apr 13 04:10:10 2003
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from sorgfalt.net (mail.sorgfalt.net) [217.160.169.191]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 194dV4-0001us-00; Sun, 13 Apr 2003 04:10:10 -0500
Received: from p508399f9.dip.t-dialin.net ([80.131.153.249] helo=djpig.hell)
by mail.sorgfalt.net with asmtp (Exim 3.35 #1)
id 194dV2-0000EV-00; Sun, 13 Apr 2003 11:10:08 +0200
Received: from djpig by djpig.hell with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
id 194dUw-0000b8-00; Sun, 13 Apr 2003 11:10:02 +0200
Date: Sun, 13 Apr 2003 11:10:02 +0200
To: debian-www@lists.debian.org
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Bug review
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mail-Followup-To: debian-www@lists.debian.org, [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i
From: Frank Lichtenheld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.3 required=4.0
tests=IN_REP_TO,QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT,REFERENCES,
SIGNATURE_SHORT_DENSE,SPAM_PHRASE_00_01,USER_AGENT,
USER_AGENT_MUTT
version=2.44
X-Spam-Level:
retitle 134077 packages.debian.org: pages for moved or deleted packages are
deleted only once a week
tags 134077 + wontfix
thanks
On Sat, Mar 29, 2003 at 07:44:46PM +0100, Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
> I've been going through the www.debian.org bug reports and have found
> some bugs I want to "change". A list follows. If someone do not agrees
> with one of my planned changes, please say so. I will wait some days
> and then do the changes.
It's now two weeks. Time enough to answer if someone care. So let's
do some changes:
> #181480: libqt3/www-debian.org
> ==============================
> This was most likely a temporary bug (as Joy's last post already says)
> Tried to reproduce it and seems to work now. Will close it.
done. See separate mail.
> #184110: missing link for mac-fdisk.txt
> ========================================
> This is a problem in the installation manual. Who's responsible
> for that? boot-floppies?
No answer to this question. Should this bug reassigned to
boot-floppies or can we fix it?
> #177870: packages.d.o: DOM caching browsers lose place because of
> SELECTED in drop-downs
> =================================================================
> The statements in the bug seem to say: wontfix or done. Any causes not to do
> this?
closing this, since noone seems to consider it a bug at our site.
> #134077: packages.debian.org shows old packages immediately after
> changing sections
> ============================================================================
> Hmm, this is one of the "deleted packages' pages are only deleted once a week"
> bugs. I would recommend to retitle or close it. Other opinions?
Have retitled it and marked it wontfix since it would hardly be fixed
before a complete renewal of p.d.o.
Gruß,
Frank
--
*** Frank Lichtenheld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ***
*** http://www.djpig.de/ ***
see also: - http://www.usta.de/
- http://fachschaft.physik.uni-karlsruhe.de/
