Your message dated Wed, 26 Mar 2003 21:02:37 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Changed get_recent_list call
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 14 Aug 2002 15:18:25 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Aug 14 10:18:25 2002
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from mailout11.sul.t-online.com [194.25.134.85]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 17ezuh-0006rc-00; Wed, 14 Aug 2002 10:18:23 -0500
Received: from fwd07.sul.t-online.de
by mailout11.sul.t-online.com with smtp
id 17ezuf-0006U4-0B; Wed, 14 Aug 2002 17:18:21 +0200
Received: from bombadil.xmldesign.de ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) by
fmrl07.sul.t-online.com
with esmtp id 17ezue-0YHt6OC; Wed, 14 Aug 2002 17:18:20 +0200
Received: by bombadil.xmldesign.de (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 0139B93299; Wed, 14 Aug 2002 17:17:21 +0200 (CEST)
Subject: www.debian.org: Recent security advisory list too short.
From: "Erich Schubert" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Debian Bug Tracking System" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Mailer: reportbug 1.99.50
Date: Wed, 14 Aug 2002 17:17:21 +0200
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: www.debian.org
Version: N/A; reported 2002-08-14
Severity: serious
Tags: security
http://www.debian.org/security/
Shows only the latest 6 DSA, but there were 15 DSA the last two weeks.
The list should contain at least all DSA from the last two weeks, better
even the last month (+ 1 as reference date), but at minimum the most
recent 6 DSA.
Thanks
Erich
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux bombadil.xmldesign.de 2.4.19-pre8-jp13 #1 Mon Jun 3 16:50:49 CEST
2002 i686
Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] (ignored: LC_ALL set)
-- no debconf information
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 156679-done) by bugs.debian.org; 26 Mar 2003 20:03:31 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Mar 26 14:03:30 2003
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from sorgfalt.net (mail.sorgfalt.net) [217.160.169.191]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 18yH7O-0000LU-00; Wed, 26 Mar 2003 14:03:26 -0600
Received: from p50839dc1.dip.t-dialin.net ([80.131.157.193] helo=djpig.hell)
by mail.sorgfalt.net with asmtp (Exim 3.35 #1)
id 18yH79-0005sj-00
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Wed, 26 Mar 2003 21:03:19 +0100
Received: from djpig by djpig.hell with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
id 18yH6d-00082F-00
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Wed, 26 Mar 2003 21:02:39 +0100
Date: Wed, 26 Mar 2003 21:02:37 +0100
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Changed get_recent_list call
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i
From: Frank Lichtenheld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.2 required=4.0
tests=SIGNATURE_SHORT_DENSE,SPAM_PHRASE_00_01,USER_AGENT,
USER_AGENT_MUTT
version=2.44
X-Spam-Level:
I changed the get_recent_list call to use the new bydate format with
timeframe one month.
Greetings,
Frank
--
*** Frank Lichtenheld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ***
*** http://www.djpig.de/ ***
see also: - http://www.usta.de/
- http://fachschaft.physik.uni-karlsruhe.de/
