Your message dated Mon, 24 Mar 2003 09:33:30 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#185918: www.debian.org: debian-med is missing links to old news has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -------------------------------------- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 22 Mar 2003 22:10:20 +0000 >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Mar 22 16:10:19 2003 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from sorgfalt.net (mail.sorgfalt.net) [217.160.169.191] by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian)) id 18wrBz-0007Jc-00; Sat, 22 Mar 2003 16:10:19 -0600 Received: from pd9530cfc.dip.t-dialin.net ([217.83.12.252] helo=djpig.hell) by mail.sorgfalt.net with asmtp (Exim 3.35 #1) id 18wrBw-00051k-00; Sat, 22 Mar 2003 23:10:17 +0100 Received: from djpig by djpig.hell with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 18wrBf-0007FC-00; Sat, 22 Mar 2003 23:09:59 +0100 From: Frank Lichtenheld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: www.debian.org: debian-med is missing links to old news X-Mailer: reportbug 1.50 Date: Sat, 22 Mar 2003 23:09:57 +0100 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sender: Frank Lichtenheld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.8 required=4.0 tests=HAS_PACKAGE,SPAM_PHRASE_00_01,SUBJECT_IS_NEWS version=2.44 X-Spam-Level: Package: www.debian.org Version: N/A; reported 2003-03-22 Severity: normal http://www.debian.org/devel/debian-med is missing a link to http://www.debian.org/devel/debian-med/News/ and http://www.debian.org/devel/debian-med/News/ only shows News from the actual year (atm none), links to the preceding years are missing. debian-jr has a similiar structure, the links I mean can be seen there. Will fix this next week, when I upload the new recent_list.wml and nobody has does it before. Bug is just a reminder of the problem. Greetings, Frank Lichtenheld -- System Information Debian Release: 3.0 Architecture: i386 Kernel: Linux djpig 2.4.20 #1 Fri Mar 7 14:16:01 CET 2003 i686 Locale: LANG=de_DE, LC_CTYPE=de_DE --------------------------------------- Received: (at 185918-done) by bugs.debian.org; 24 Mar 2003 08:33:55 +0000 >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Mar 24 02:33:55 2003 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from sorgfalt.net (mail.sorgfalt.net) [217.160.169.191] by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian)) id 18xNP0-0001MY-00; Mon, 24 Mar 2003 02:33:55 -0600 Received: from p50839c74.dip.t-dialin.net ([80.131.156.116] helo=djpig.hell) by mail.sorgfalt.net with asmtp (Exim 3.35 #1) id 18xNOy-0008No-00 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Mon, 24 Mar 2003 09:33:54 +0100 Received: from djpig by djpig.hell with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 18xNOd-0000ep-00 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Mon, 24 Mar 2003 09:33:31 +0100 Date: Mon, 24 Mar 2003 09:33:30 +0100 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Bug#185918: www.debian.org: debian-med is missing links to old news Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i From: Frank Lichtenheld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.9 required=4.0 tests=IN_REP_TO,QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT,REFERENCES, SIGNATURE_SHORT_DENSE,SPAM_PHRASE_00_01,SUBJECT_IS_NEWS, USER_AGENT,USER_AGENT_MUTT version=2.44 X-Spam-Level: On Sat, Mar 22, 2003 at 11:09:57PM +0100, Frank Lichtenheld wrote: > http://www.debian.org/devel/debian-med is missing a link to > http://www.debian.org/devel/debian-med/News/ and > http://www.debian.org/devel/debian-med/News/ only shows > News from the actual year (atm none), links to the > preceding years are missing. > > debian-jr has a similiar structure, the links I mean can be seen > there. > > Will fix this next week, when I upload the new recent_list.wml > and nobody has does it before. Bug is just a reminder of the problem. done. -- *** Frank Lichtenheld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> *** *** http://www.djpig.de/ *** see also: - http://www.usta.de/ - http://fachschaft.physik.uni-karlsruhe.de/