Your message dated Tue, 18 Mar 2003 21:10:58 -0000 (GMT)
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Unintentional duplicate submission
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 20 Feb 2003 19:23:45 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Feb 20 13:23:44 2003
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from public1-stoc3-5-cust41.oldh.broadband.ntl.com (souris.perth)
[213.106.85.41] (john)
by master.debian.org with smtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 18lwIK-0001Dr-00; Thu, 20 Feb 2003 13:23:44 -0600
Received: (qmail 11399 invoked by uid 1000); 21 Oct 2002 02:42:27 -0000
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
From: John G Ineson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: lists.debian.org: subscription attempts throttled even on failure
X-Mailer: reportbug 1.50
Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2002 03:42:26 +0100
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.2 required=4.0
tests=HAS_PACKAGE,SPAM_PHRASE_00_01
version=2.44
X-Spam-Level:
Package: lists.debian.org
Version: N/A; reported 2002-10-21
Severity: normal
Subscription via the website is limited to 5 script runs in a certain
period. Presumably this is to stop people flooding 3rd parties with
subscription confirmation messsages, and fair enough. However it also
counts unsuccessful subscription attempts -- such as where subscribe.pl
returns an error. So in the event of multiple failures, the user is left
unable to retry. Which is not ideal.
-- System Information
Debian Release: 3.0
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux souris 2.4.19-fswan+htb+lmsens #1 Sat Oct 19 20:06:30 BST 2002
i586
Locale: LANG=en_GB, LC_CTYPE=en_GB
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 181798-done) by bugs.debian.org; 18 Mar 2003 21:11:14 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Mar 18 15:11:12 2003
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from mta03-svc.ntlworld.com [62.253.162.43]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 18vOMa-0001ho-00; Tue, 18 Mar 2003 15:11:12 -0600
Received: from termite ([213.106.85.41]) by mta03-svc.ntlworld.com
(InterMail vM.4.01.03.37 201-229-121-137-20020806) with ESMTP
id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
Tue, 18 Mar 2003 21:11:08 +0000
Received: from localhost
([127.0.0.1] helo=sneakerpimp.fsnet.co.uk
ident=[+zy/DMvI55Uk5nSzuMXWm7w23lmjTwbh])
by termite with smtp (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
id 18vOMM-00078R-00; Tue, 18 Mar 2003 21:10:58 +0000
Received: from 192.168.23.3 (proxying for 192.168.23.2)
(SquirrelMail authenticated user john)
by webmail.perth with HTTP;
Tue, 18 Mar 2003 21:10:58 -0000 (GMT)
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Tue, 18 Mar 2003 21:10:58 -0000 (GMT)
Subject: Unintentional duplicate submission
From: "John Ineson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED],[EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Mailer: SquirrelMail (version 1.4.0 RC1)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1
X-Priority: 3
Importance: Normal
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.4 required=4.0
tests=MSG_ID_ADDED_BY_MTA_3,SIGNATURE_SHORT_DENSE,
SPAM_PHRASE_00_01
version=2.44
X-Spam-Level: *
Unintentional duplicate submission, this can be closed.
--
John Ineson
