Your message dated 12 Mar 2003 09:23:35 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#184417: www.debian.org: Debian weekly report for 11 Mar 
2003 has no synopsis
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 12 Mar 2003 05:36:22 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Mar 11 23:36:22 2003
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from c-24-131-182-65.mw.client2.attbi.com 
(starlite.bonci.ne.client2.attbi.com) [24.131.182.65] 
        by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
        id 18syuc-0001h7-00; Tue, 11 Mar 2003 23:36:22 -0600
Received: from jaybonci by starlite.bonci.ne.client2.attbi.com with local (Exim 
3.36 #1 (Debian))
        id 18syt1-0003kL-00; Wed, 12 Mar 2003 00:34:43 -0500
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Jay Bonci <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: www.debian.org: Debian weekly report for 11 Mar 2003 has no synopsis
X-Mailer: reportbug 2.10
Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2003 00:34:42 -0500
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Jay Bonci <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-BadReturnPath: [EMAIL PROTECTED] rewritten as [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  using "From" header
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.4 required=4.0
        tests=HAS_PACKAGE,PGP_SIGNATURE,SPAM_PHRASE_00_01,SUBJECT_FREQ,
              SUBJECT_MONTH,SUBJECT_MONTH_2
        version=2.44
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: www.debian.org
Version: unavailable; reported 2003-03-12
Severity: minor

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

At:
http://www.debian.org/News/weekly/

The debian weekly report for 11 Mar 2003 doesn't have a synopsis
http://www.debian.org/News/weekly/2003/10/

It's not major. Please close this bug if someone notices it
and fixes it without reading this report.

Keep up the hard work guys!

                --jay

- -- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux starlite 2.4.19-686 #1 Mon Nov 18 23:59:03 EST 2002 i686
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQE+bsbyZNh5D+C4st4RAs7CAJ99tk83jKqLWBtu/XqmeA88Jc5DUwCdGOcA
A0uTFJWZs0Npr/cxSdnwFhg=
=dGHU
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

---------------------------------------
Received: (at 184417-done) by bugs.debian.org; 12 Mar 2003 14:24:54 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Mar 12 08:24:54 2003
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from manifestresearch.com (server1.manifestresearch.com) 
[64.39.15.228] 
        by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
        id 18t7A6-0005z8-00; Wed, 12 Mar 2003 08:24:54 -0600
Received: from [10.20.30.42] (c-24-131-182-65.mw.client2.attbi.com 
[24.131.182.65])
        (authenticated)
        by server1.manifestresearch.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id 
h2CEOnp20568;
        Wed, 12 Mar 2003 08:24:50 -0600
Subject: Re: Bug#184417: www.debian.org: Debian weekly report for 11 Mar
        2003 has no synopsis
From: Jay Bonci <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Gerfried Fuchs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
         <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; 
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-TGXsPddJS2CdJhJZYEqj"
Organization: 
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.2.2 
Date: 12 Mar 2003 09:23:35 -0500
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.7 required=4.0
        tests=IN_REP_TO,PGP_SIGNATURE_2,QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT,REFERENCES,
              SPAM_PHRASE_00_01,SUBJECT_FREQ,SUBJECT_MONTH,
              SUBJECT_MONTH_2
        version=2.44
X-Spam-Level: 


--=-TGXsPddJS2CdJhJZYEqj
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Wed, 2003-03-12 at 05:34, Gerfried Fuchs wrote:
> * Jay Bonci <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-03-12 00:34]:
> > At:
> > http://www.debian.org/News/weekly/
> >=20
> > The debian weekly report for 11 Mar 2003 doesn't have a synopsis
> > http://www.debian.org/News/weekly/2003/10/
>=20
>  I can't reproduce that.  Can you be a little bit more verbose, which
> language version were you looking at?
>=20
>  If you can't reproduce it please mail <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> which a message that it is gone and close the bugreport with that
> yourself, thanks.  Otherwise please be a little bit more verbose and
> tell us what language you were looking at.
>=20
>  Have fun,
> Alfie

It seems to have been cleared up by cron job or observant developer.
Thanks

                --jay

--=20
Jay Bonci    | <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
GPG: E0B8B2DE| 562B 35DC BE8D 7802 DB31  6423 64D8 790F E0B8 B2DE




--=-TGXsPddJS2CdJhJZYEqj
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc
Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQA+b0LlZNh5D+C4st4RAsQpAJ9goxD8My6vrNYH0xWjj/JOy9yThACeMyHL
kWHA8/7enwIG9ZJzdcBdV3w=
=wETH
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--=-TGXsPddJS2CdJhJZYEqj--

Reply via email to