* Philipe Gaspar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-02-20 23:56]:
> <p><em>Q: I've seen DSA 100 and DSA 102, now where is DSA 101?</em></p>
> <p>A: Several vendors (mostly of GNU/Linux, but also of BSD
> deriviates) coordinate security advisories for some incidents and
> agree to a particular timeline so that all vendors are able to
>
> I think that this question could be removed from the FAQ since DSA 101 is
> already on security alert list.
This is rather an example than a real rule. It can apply to future
versions, too. Shall we write "DSA XXX and DSA XXX+2, now where is DSA
XXX+1?"
I don't think that that would be much clearer or else. I personally
would leave it the way it is. It should be quite obvious that the
questions are usual standard questions that come somewhat "along the
lines", and not neccesarily *exactly* in the way they are written down.
If you have a sugguestion beside the above change (which is nonsense to
me) how to clearify that it would be not misunderstandable it would be
appreciated.
So long,
Alfie
--
GUIs normally make it simple to accomplish simple actions and impossible to
accomplish complex actions.
-- Doug Gwyn in comp.unix.wizards
