On Tue, Jan 01, 2002 at 09:23:15AM +1100, Craig Small wrote: [...] > It's good enough for me, I suspect it needs a bit more work but I'm not > too worried about it. It's also xhtml. BTW Dennis, I haven't put your > no <ul> in <p> changes yet :/
As you mentioned this problem more than once, I'll say some words about it ;) Many pages do contain <p><ul>...</ul> or <p><pre>...</pre> tags. The first idea when adding closing tags is to write <p><ul>...</ul></p> Unfortunately this is wrong, because <p> cannot (as defined in HTML specs) contain <ul> tags, and previous syntax is in fact equivalent to <p></p><ul>...</ul> I would suggest to recommend validation by wdg-html-validator instead of weblint, because it is based on a real SGML parser (weblint seems to be a basic HTML syntax checker). Denis
