Your message dated Sun, 9 Dec 2001 21:00:25 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#123094: wrong reference to gcc-2.95.2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 9 Dec 2001 16:23:03 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Dec 09 10:23:03 2001
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from mail.cs.tu-berlin.de [130.149.17.13] (root)
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 16D6jH-0006RI-00; Sun, 09 Dec 2001 10:23:03 -0600
Received: from bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de ([EMAIL PROTECTED] [130.149.19.1])
by mail.cs.tu-berlin.de (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id RAA22220
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sun, 9 Dec 2001 17:20:04 +0100 (MET)
Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
by bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de (8.10.2+Sun/8.9.3) id fB9GK4E15225;
Sun, 9 Dec 2001 17:20:04 +0100 (MET)
From: Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="1ioqIeFKZb"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sun, 9 Dec 2001 17:20:03 +0100
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: wrong reference to gcc-2.95.2
X-Mailer: VM 6.89 under 21.1 (patch 14) "Cuyahoga Valley" XEmacs Lucid
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--1ioqIeFKZb
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Description: message body text
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Package: www.debian.org
Severity: important
It seems, that on
http://packages.debian.org/testing/devel/gcc.html
the wrong source package is referenced. There is no 2.95.2 in testing
... gcc-2.95.4 is.
--1ioqIeFKZb
Content-Type: message/rfc822
Content-Description: forwarded message
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Received: from cartero.cs.tu-berlin.de ([EMAIL PROTECTED] [130.149.17.20])
by mail.cs.tu-berlin.de (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id RAA21520
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sun, 9 Dec 2001 17:12:23 +0100 (MET)
Received: from basm.cerias.purdue.edu (basm.cerias.purdue.edu [128.10.243.21])
by cartero.cs.tu-berlin.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id A4D53130B8B
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sun, 9 Dec 2001 17:12:22 +0100 (MET)
Received: from oeuvre.acio.gov. (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by basm.cerias.purdue.edu (8.9.3+Sun/8.9.3) with ESMTP id LAA12278;
Sun, 9 Dec 2001 11:12:20 -0500 (EST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Mailer: VM 6.72 under 21.1 (patch 10) "Capitol Reef" XEmacs Lucid
X-Covert-Signature:
iD8DBQE8E41eIw2dkfh5sRQRAlNxAKC1U8co4ZR1xwS+zhLvMdW0ljmlAACcCK7q
d87nEm6WCblkyR6rY1MSEyk= =QGN6
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
User-Agent: EMIKO/1.13.9 (Euglena tripteris) FLIM/1.13.2 (Kasanui) APEL/10.2
MULE XEmacs/21.1 (patch 10) (Capitol Reef) (i386-debian-linux)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Bug#123067: gcc: Rebuild of gcc 1:2.95.2-13 from source with extra
CFLAGS causes Internal compiler error (gpc1 coredumps)
Date: Sun, 9 Dec 2001 16:12:18 +0000 (GMT)
>>>>> On Sun, 9 Dec 2001 16:27:45 +0100, Matthias Klose wrote:
> it looks like you tried again with gcc-2.95.2.
Hi,
Thank you for the reply. I downloaded the source files displayed at the
bottom of the Debian web page for Package: gcc 2:2.95.4-8 at
``http://packages.debian.org/testing/devel/gcc.html''. The files
include ``gcc_2.95.2.orig.tar.gz'' which extracts into the
``gcc-2.95.2'' directory. After patching using ``zcat
gcc_2.95.2-20.diff.gz | patch -p0'', I then modified the
``debian/rules2'' file manually, and then issued ``fakeroot make -f
debian/rules binary''.
Thus to my knowledge I am building the version requested. I was able to
automate the above process when I fetched the ``stable'' version because
my ``/etc/apt/sources.list'' includes the lines
deb-src http://http.us.debian.org/debian/ stable main non-free contrib
deb-src http://non-us.debian.org/debian-non-US stable/non-US main contrib
non-free
However I do not know of an obvious way to have ``apt-get source gcc''
fetch the ``testing'' version of the package instead, so I tried
(unsuccessfully) to modify the ``sources.list'' file by hand. After
downloading the files I was not sure how to have ``apt-get''
automatically extract and patch using the files that are in the current
directory.
I am happy to be of help, but I am not sure how to proceed at this
point. Thank you for your time.
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>> >> Subject: gcc: Rebuild of gcc 1:2.95.2-13 from source with extra CFLAGS
>> >> causes Internal compiler error (gpc1 coredumps)
>> >> Package: gcc
>> >> Version: 1:2.95.2-13
>> > please retry with the current gcc-2.95 from testing/unstable (2.95.4).
>> Thank you for the response. I tried building the testing version after
>> verifying that I have all dependencies to do so (I am running
>> stable-2.2r4), and the output I get is follows. I hope to be of
>> assistance, but I am not sure how to proceed. Please let me know if I
>> can be of further help.
>> ::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
>> ../.././xgpc -B../.././ -c -I. -W -Wall -Wpointer-arith -Wwrite-strings
>> -Wmissing-prototypes -Wmissing-declarations -g3 -O3
>> -DRTS_RELEASE_STRING="'`cat
>> /home/mcrogan/test2/gcc-2.95.2.orig/src-native/gcc/p/rts/rts-version`'"
>> --unit-path=/home/mcrogan/test2/gcc-2.95.2.orig/src-native/gcc/p/rts
>> --automake
>> /home/mcrogan/test2/gcc-2.95.2.orig/src-native/gcc/p/rts/error.pas
>> In file included from
>> /home/mcrogan/test2/gcc-2.95.2.orig/src-native/gcc/p/rts/error.pas:197:
--1ioqIeFKZb--
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 123094-close) by bugs.debian.org; 9 Dec 2001 19:59:28 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Dec 09 13:59:28 2001
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from cibalia.gkvk.hr [161.53.211.3]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 16DA6g-0001J2-00; Sun, 09 Dec 2001 13:59:27 -0600
Received: from joy by cibalia.gkvk.hr with local (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian))
id 16DA7d-0002pZ-00; Sun, 09 Dec 2001 21:00:25 +0100
Date: Sun, 9 Dec 2001 21:00:25 +0100
To: Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Chris Tillman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Bug#123094: wrong reference to gcc-2.95.2
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; from [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Sun, Dec 09, 2001
at 08:34:40PM +0100
From: Josip Rodin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sun, Dec 09, 2001 at 08:34:40PM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote:
> > > Package: www.debian.org
> > > Severity: important
> > >
> > > It seems, that on
> > >
> > > http://packages.debian.org/testing/devel/gcc.html
> > >
> > > the wrong source package is referenced. There is no 2.95.2 in testing
> > > ... gcc-2.95.4 is.
> >
> > It looks like you were given an ambiguous reference
> > (testing/unstable). Those are two different distributions. Is 2.95.4
> > in unstable?
>
> in testing and in unstable.
This file,
-rw-rw-r-- 1 treacy debwww 2255745 Dec 8 15:07 testing/main.Sources
includes:
110f1e5b3adfefc9d7be071e91c54f6a 13721892 gcc_2.95.2.orig.tar.gz
And the output of `madison gcc` on auric includes
gcc | 2.95.2-20 | testing | source
This is not a bug on the packages.d.o web site.
--
2. That which causes joy or happiness.
