On Thu, Sep 13, 2001, Matt Kraai wrote:
> This is true only if you consider all of the untranslated files to
> be outdated translations. I originally made this exact mistake,
> but corrected it after committing it. Please see the CVS log.
> I've been rethinking this, though. It might be better to replace
> it with the following:
>
> $percent_o{$lang} = $percent_a{$lang} - $percent_t{$lang};
*nirg* Thanks for fast response before any harm is done (I hope the
script is not running right now). I thought the up-to-date and outdated
values percentages are now calculated wrt/ the translated files and not
the full value? Wasn't that commited, too? I think that makes up a
much more valueable value than calculate them wrt/ all the files.
It was that I just saw it on the page that Matt did - Matt, didn't you
also submit that part? If not, why not? If yes, why doesn't it work?
:)
> Heh, I'm a pessimist.
Alright, I'm usually more a realist, and rounding seems to be more to
the true values :) And, in the handling without rounding could have
been a mistake if all three values got rounded down, up-to-date and
outdated could make up one less in the sum than translated files (yes, I
could be quite pedantic with this, I know ;)
So long,
Alfie [sorry for the inconvenience]
--
You never learn anything | /"""""\ ,'~~.
by doing it right. | / chaos \ alfie.ist.org |o ?~\
-- unknown | \inside!/ [EMAIL PROTECTED] /_ ~<\
| \_____/ \__,~ \>
