Your message dated Wed, 8 Aug 2001 08:20:17 -0600
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Bug#108029: db.d.o searching for
maintainers on vacation doesn't work]
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Darren Benham
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 8 Aug 2001 10:08:34 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Aug 08 05:08:34 2001
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from freesurfmta03.sunrise.ch (freesurfmail.sunrise.ch)
[194.230.0.32]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 15UQGP-0000o2-00; Wed, 08 Aug 2001 05:08:34 -0500
Received: from tpo2.sourcepole (194.230.135.33) by freesurfmail.sunrise.ch
(5.5.034)
id 3B7091400000421D; Wed, 8 Aug 2001 12:06:10 +0200
Received: from tpo by tpo2.sourcepole with local (Exim 3.22 #1 (Debian))
id 15K5G1-0000FE-00; Tue, 10 Jul 2001 23:41:25 +0200
From: Tomas Pospisek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: db.d.o searching for maintainers on vacation doesn't work
X-Reportbug-Version: 1.18
X-Mailer: reportbug 1.18
Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2001 23:41:25 +0200
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Tomas Pospisek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: www.debian.org
Version: N/A; reported 2001-07-10
Severity: minor
i.e. does yield 0 result entries (and that by this time now, when many
developers are on vacation...).
Anyway the checkbox is a bit confusing - even to the programmer of the search
engine I guess ;-)
*t
-- System Information
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux tpo2 2.4.4 #1 Mon May 14 20:49:56 CEST 2001 i686
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 108029-close) by bugs.debian.org; 8 Aug 2001 14:20:19 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Aug 08 09:20:19 2001
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from opensource.lineo.com [204.246.147.130]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 15UUC2-0006ZV-00; Wed, 08 Aug 2001 09:20:19 -0500
Received: by opensource.lineo.com (Postfix, from userid 1011)
id 88EE71934E7; Wed, 8 Aug 2001 08:20:17 -0600 (MDT)
Date: Wed, 8 Aug 2001 08:20:17 -0600
From: Matt Kraai <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Bug#108029: db.d.o searching for maintainers on
vacation doesn't work]
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Howdy,
Vacation search only works after logging in for privacy reasons.
It would be less confusing to remove it from the un-logged-in
search page, however.
Closing and forwarding to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Matt
----- Forwarded message from Tomas Pospisek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -----
Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2001 23:41:25 +0200
From: Tomas Pospisek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Bug#108029: db.d.o searching for maintainers on vacation doesn't work
Package: www.debian.org
Version: N/A; reported 2001-07-10
Severity: minor
i.e. does yield 0 result entries (and that by this time now, when many
developers are on vacation...).
Anyway the checkbox is a bit confusing - even to the programmer of the search
engine I guess ;-)
*t
-- System Information
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux tpo2 2.4.4 #1 Mon May 14 20:49:56 CEST 2001 i686
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
----- End forwarded message -----
