On Fri, Apr 06, 2001 at 08:53:49PM +0200, Martin Schulze wrote: > > > > > . a sample layout so I can provide content. > > > > ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ > > > > > > Since nobody stepped forward, again, as expected. attached is a proposal, > > > which of the two versions look better? Or should something else be > > > used instead of <ul>/<dl>. Suggestions? > > > > The second version looks better, but you should probably put the article > > title in the <dt> and the date (perhaps surround it with <:&spokendate():>) > > in the <dd>. > > Can you provide a proper example? I'm too dumb, lame etc.
For example, <dt><strong>Article about Debian Jr.</strong></dt> <dd><a href="http://www.computerchannel.de/";>computerchannel.de</a>, Germany, 2000-06-04</dd> > I'm also concerned about i18n and haven't come up with a proper > solution. When titles won't be translated the entire listing could be > moved into a .data file. Err, I don't think I understand... it can be done like e.g. donations.wml is done. Which is suboptimal, probably, but it seems to be working... > For example <germany> could make it into all languages etc. See <DEc> in the countries.wml template :) -- Digital Electronic Being Intended for Assassination and Nullification
