Your message dated Sat, 6 Jan 2001 18:26:13 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#81407: Site says unstable == woody
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Darren Benham
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 6 Jan 2001 16:45:06 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Jan 06 10:45:06 2001
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from copernicus.mpcnet.com.br [200.246.29.18]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 14EwSn-000584-00; Sat, 06 Jan 2001 10:45:05 -0600
Received: from localhost (d1p54.mpcnet.com.br [200.246.29.118])
by copernicus.mpcnet.com.br (8.8.8/8.8.6) with ESMTP id OAA06284;
Sat, 6 Jan 2001 14:45:01 -0200 (EST)
Received: from jeronimo by localhost with local (Exim 3.20 #1 (Debian))
id 14EwQ8-0000Rw-00; Sat, 06 Jan 2001 14:42:20 -0200
From: Jeronimo Pellegrini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Site says unstable == woody
X-Reportbug-Version: 1.8
X-Mailer: reportbug 1.8
Date: Sat, 06 Jan 2001 14:42:20 -0200
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Jeronimo Pellegrini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: www.debian.org
Version: N/A; reported 2001-01-06
Severity: normal
Hello.
http://www.debian.org/releases/ says unstable == woody, and some people seem
to be
confused ("package <foo> vanished from unstable")...
Maybe the page should say something about testing, or at least state that
unstable == sid?
Thanks,
J.
-- System Information
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux socrates 2.4.0-test13-pre7 #1 Tue Jan 2 17:03:30 BRST 2001 i686
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 81407-done) by bugs.debian.org; 6 Jan 2001 17:26:08 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Jan 06 11:26:08 2001
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from cibalia.gkvk.hr [161.53.211.3] (mail)
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 14Ex6W-0000MR-00; Sat, 06 Jan 2001 11:26:08 -0600
Received: from joy by cibalia.gkvk.hr with local (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian))
id 14Ex6b-0005Jg-00; Sat, 06 Jan 2001 18:26:13 +0100
Date: Sat, 6 Jan 2001 18:26:13 +0100
To: Jeronimo Pellegrini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Bug#81407: Site says unstable == woody
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; from [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Sat, Jan 06, 2001
at 02:42:20PM -0200
From: Josip Rodin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sat, Jan 06, 2001 at 02:42:20PM -0200, Jeronimo Pellegrini wrote:
> http://www.debian.org/releases/ says unstable == woody, and some people
> seem to be confused ("package <foo> vanished from unstable")...
>
> Maybe the page should say something about testing, or at least state that
> unstable == sid?
Yes. Fixed in CVS, will be on the site within six hours.
--
Digital Electronic Being Intended for Assassination and Nullification
