On Tue, Dec 05, 2000 at 11:34:48PM -0500, James A. Treacy wrote: > On Tue, Dec 05, 2000 at 05:26:02PM -0800, Matt Kraai wrote: > > The recent xmcd advisory contains a bad link. Is it alright to fix > > advisories even though this will cause them to differ from the > > announcment? > > > I have no problem with correcting information. But when making changes > to the security pages, make sure that you inform [EMAIL PROTECTED]
OK, I'll go ahead and commit this change then. I'll be sure to inform both debian-www and mstone as I work through the bad links in the security advisories. Matt P.S. Here's the patch again for no good reason. Index: english/security/2000/20001121a.wml =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/webwml/webwml/english/security/2000/20001121a.wml,v retrieving revision 1.1 diff -u -r1.1 20001121a.wml --- english/security/2000/20001121a.wml 2000/11/22 22:56:43 1.1 +++ english/security/2000/20001121a.wml 2000/12/06 01:23:31 @@ -25,7 +25,7 @@ <h4>Source archives:</h4> <blockquote> - <fileurl "http://security.debian.org/dists/potato/updates/main/source/xmcd_5.0-7.1.dsc";> + <fileurl "http://security.debian.org/dists/potato/updates/main/source/xmcd_2.5pl1-7.1.dsc";> <fileurl "http://security.debian.org/dists/potato/updates/main/source/xmcd_2.5pl1-7.1.diff.gz";> <fileurl "http://security.debian.org/dists/potato/updates/main/source/xmcd_2.5pl1.orig.tar.gz";> </blockquote>
pgpjV44nZjDvr.pgp
Description: PGP signature
