Josip Rodin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I disagree, it's useful, having directories without index.html is bad.
I deny it is actually useful. All of its information is more completely and clearly stated at http://www.debian.org/releases/potato/index.*.html. Inaccurate and incomplete information (translations missing) is worse than none. > If we put that in webwml, that means creating one dir per architecture, with > a Makefile and an index.wml file. Aside from the cruftiness issue :) the > problem is that other arches will most probably get out of sync with i386. > If they're generated from a single source, that's less likely to happen. Actually, if this is solely for the web site, and you *really* want this, then it would be quite easy to do it in WML without adding to the maintenance burder, since it could share the same functions that generate the documentation matrix on http://www.debian.org/releases/potato/index.*.html. Another alternative is to redir from someone try to do a dir listing at http://www.debian.org/releases/potato/arch or http://www.debian.org/releases/potato/arch/<arches> to http://www.debian.org/releases/potato/. Whatever the Debian WWW folks tell me to do I shall do. -- .....Adam Di [EMAIL PROTECTED]<URL:http://www.onShore.com/>
