Hello Joy,
On Thu, Aug 17, 2000 at 03:19:46PM +0200, Josip Rodin wrote:
> Hi guys,
> I noticed Anthony's changes to templates made all the pages look bad under
> wml2, so I fixed it. What I noticed later is that the change makes the pages
> look bad under wml1. >:< We could probably avoid this problem by undoing the
> initial changes, I guess...
Sorry, I didn't anticipate that my changes would create problems
for the wml2 migration ("{#mainbody:" vs. "{#mainbody#:").
I was hoping that the "{#mainbody:" syntax is faster than "..mainbody>>",
and that it is only a small change from that to wml_2.x's syntax.
BTW, what is the plan for the migration from wml_1.7.4 to wml_2.0.x?
e.g. timeframe, which machine (master or lully or some other?),
anything that we should note, and anything that we could help with...
:-) (Thanks!)
> Anyway, I also noticed this in the daily build log:
>
> Running make install -> wml
>
> real 568m21.397s
> user 400m42.290s
> sys 31m6.000s
>
> Nine and a half hours. :(
Where may I find the build log? (Sorry, it is probably a FAQ... :-)
> So I got wml 2.0.2 installed on master (hi Thing :) and am starting a
> rebuild now. The package can be found in woody, and it installs fine on
> potato machines. Considering everyone should be using potato nowadays
> because it is the release named stable, this shouldn't be a problem.
Great! Yes, whenever you want to make the switch to WML 2.x, just
let us know, and we'll switch right over. :-)
Hmm... if possible, it would be really nice to have WML 2.x in
Debian 2.2rev1. :-)
Anthony
--
Anthony Fok Tung-Ling Civil and Environmental Engineering
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] University of Alberta, Canada
Debian Chinese Project -- http://www.debian.org/international/chinese/
Come visit Our Lady of Victory Camp -- http://www.olvc.ab.ca/
