James A. Treacy wrote: > Is the following better? looks fine
> > --- social_contract.wml.orig Tue Mar 28 10:32:10 2000 > +++ social_contract.wml Tue Mar 28 10:26:12 2000 > @@ -16,7 +16,8 @@ > --> > > <P>Debian, the producers of the Debian GNU/Linux system, have created the > -<strong>Debian Social Contract</strong>. The contract, initially designed > +<strong>Debian Social Contract</strong>. The <a href="#guidelines">Debian > Free Software > +Guidelines (DFSG)</a> part of the contract, initially designed > as as a set of commitments that we agree to abide by, has been adopted by > the free software community as the basis of the > <a href="http://www.opensource.org/osd.html";>Open Source Definition</a>. > @@ -71,7 +72,7 @@ > lists) for non-free software packages. > </OL> > <HR> > -<H2><a name="guidelines">The Debian Free Software Guidelines</a></H2> > +<H2><a name="guidelines">The Debian Free Software Guidelines (DFSG)</a></H2> > <OL> > <LI><P><strong>Free Redistribution</strong> > <P>The license of a Debian component may not restrict any -- see shy jo
