Your message dated Tue, 25 Jan 2000 05:11:23 -0600
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#49523: web-support for extracting GnuPG key
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Darren Benham
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 8 Nov 1999 02:18:19 +0000
Received: (qmail 2321 invoked from network); 8 Nov 1999 02:18:15 -0000
Received: from mail-smtp.socket.net (216.106.1.32)
  by master.debian.org with SMTP; 8 Nov 1999 02:18:15 -0000
Received: from mail.socket.net (mail.socket.net [216.106.1.7])
        by mail-smtp.socket.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id KAA08951
        for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Mon, 8 Nov 1999 10:24:46 -0600
Received: from glitch.snoozer.net ([216.106.1.80]) by mail.socket.net ; Sun, 07 
Nov 1999 20:18:08 -0600
Received: from localhost (glitch.snoozer.net) [127.0.0.1] (mail)
        by glitch.snoozer.net with esmtp (Exim 3.03 #1 (Debian))
        id 11keMY-0003N4-00; Sun, 07 Nov 1999 20:16:54 -0600
Received: from adric by glitch.snoozer.net with local (Exim 3.03 #1 (Debian))
        id 11keMY-0003My-00; Sun, 07 Nov 1999 20:16:54 -0600
From: "Gregory T. Norris" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: web-support for extracting GnuPG key
X-Reportbug-Version: 0.40
X-Mailer: reportbug 0.40
Date: Sun, 07 Nov 1999 20:16:54 -0600
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: "Gregory T. Norris" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Package: www.debian.org
Version: N/A; reported 1999-11-07
Severity: wishlist

We include support for extracting developer's PGP public keys using a
web-interface at <http://www.debian.org/devel/extract_key>.  Now that we
have a non-beta version of GnuPG, and are making use of it throughout
the project, we should have a similar interface for GnuPG keys (or
enhancing the current interface to support both... makes no difference
to me :-)

Thanx!

-- System Information
Debian Release: potato
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux glitch 2.2.13 #1 SMP Thu Oct 21 22:57:38 CDT 1999 i686

---------------------------------------
Received: (at 49523-done) by bugs.debian.org; 25 Jan 2000 11:11:09 +0000
Received: (qmail 1476 invoked from network); 25 Jan 2000 11:11:08 -0000
Received: from mail-smtp.socket.net (216.106.1.32)
  by master.debian.org with SMTP; 25 Jan 2000 11:11:08 -0000
Received: from socket.net (mail.socket.net [216.106.1.7])
        by mail-smtp.socket.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id TAA05604
        for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Tue, 25 Jan 2000 19:17:56 -0600
Received: from glitch.snoozer.net ([216.106.1.81]) by socket.net ; Tue, 25 Jan 
2000 04:46:06 -0600
Received: from localhost (glitch.snoozer.net) [127.0.0.1] (mail)
        by glitch.snoozer.net with esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian))
        id 12D3sZ-0000XL-00; Tue, 25 Jan 2000 05:11:23 -0600
Received: from adric by glitch.snoozer.net with local (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian))
        id 12D3sZ-0000XF-00
        for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Tue, 25 Jan 2000 05:11:23 -0600
Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2000 05:11:23 -0600
From: "Gregory T. Norris" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Bug#49523: web-support for extracting GnuPG key
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
User-Agent: Mutt/1.0i
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; from [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Mon, Nov 08, 1999 
at 02:18:36AM -0000
Sender: "Gregory T. Norris" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

It looks like the webpage in question was updated a week or so ago, and
now includes current instructions for obtaining developer's PGP/GnuPG
keys.  Since it's no longer an issue, I'm closing this bug now.

Cheers!

Reply via email to