Vincent Renardias said: > it currently reads: > > elm-me+ >=2.4pl25ME+56-1 OK? > > while it should read > > elm-me+ >=2.4pl25ME+65-1 OK? > Why? I couldn't find any Y2K fixes in the changelog between these versions. Have I missed something?
> > I just saw another problem; the table says: > > emacs20 20.2 OK? > > while there *is* a y2k bug in emacs20 20.3-10. (see #43249) Hmm, you're right, even though the GNU web page says it is ok. I will adjust the entry and put the URL as the bug report. - Craig -- Craig Small VK2XLZ, PGP: AD 8D D8 63 6E BF C3 C7 47 41 B1 A2 1F 46 EC 90 Eye-Net Consulting http://www.eye-net.com.au/ <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> MIEEE <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Debian developer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
