At Tue, 23 Nov 1999 11:18:32 -0500, James A. Treacy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Anyone here know Japanese and willing to translate for us?
It's a brief translation. He want to know perl5.004 is really year 2000 compliant. Date: Tue, 23 Nov 1999 15:37:11 +0900 From: Kihara Seiko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: About perl5.004 year 2000 compliance I had a look at your web pages, in which Y2K problem has been fixed at perl-base 5.004-6 and the following URL is given as the reference, but I can't find perl5.004 anywhere. http://language.perl.com/news/y2k.html According to the above page, perl (without version number) is already year 2000 compliant, but which statements describe that perl5.004 is year 2000 compliant? Would you like to tell me where does official statements in perl site announce that perl5.004 or later is year 2000 compliant, please? Sincerely yours > ----- Forwarded message from Kihara Seiko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ----- > > Date: Tue, 23 Nov 1999 15:37:11 +0900 > From: Kihara Seiko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: perl5.004?$B$N?(B > 2000?$BG/LdBj$K4X$7$F?(B > > $B%[!<%`%Z!<%8$rGR8+$$$?$7$^$7$?!#(B > perl-base 5.004-6$B$K$F(B2000$BG/LdBj$OBP1~$5$l$F$$$k(B > $B$H$N$3$H$G2<5-$N(BURL$B$,;2>[EMAIL PROTECTED],!"(B > $B$I$3$K$b(Bperl5.004$B$H$O=q$$$F$*$j$^$;$s$G$7$?!#(B > > http://language.perl.com/news/y2k.html > > $B>e5-$N5-;v$rFI$_$^$9$H(BPerl$B!J%P!<%8%g%s;XDj$J$7!K$K(B > $B4X$7$F$O$9$Y$F(B2000$BG/$KBP1~$G$-$k$h$&$J;v$,=q$$$F$"$j(B > $B$^$7$?$,!"6qBNE*$K$I$NItJ,$K(B5.004$B$,(B2000$BG/LdBj$KBP1~$H(B > $B=q$$$F$"$k$N$G$7$g$&$+!#(B > > $B$*K;$7$$$H$3$m!"?=$7Lu$4$6$$$^$;$s$,!"(BPerl$B%5%$%H$N8x<0(B > $BH/I=$N$I$3$K(B5.004$B0J9_$,(B2000$BG/BP1~$G$"$k$+$,8+Ev$?$j$^$;(B > $B$s$N$G!"$*65$([EMAIL PROTECTED]&$+!#(B > > $B$h$m$7$/$*4j$$$$$?$7$^$9!#(B > > > ----- End forwarded message ----- Regards, Fumitoshi UKAI
