On Tue, Nov 23, 1999 at 12:27:02PM +0800, Anthony Wong wrote: > On Tue, Nov 23, 1999 at 06:06:29AM +0200, Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho wrote: > |No, WML files can be in their own encodings. The generated .html is what > |needs to be in UTF-8; conversion from any other encoding is automizable > |so the daily make (or the wml program) can do it. > > Ah sorry, I think I was not clear on what I was saying. Actually my point is > the same as yours: convert the output that we got from processing the WML > files to UTF-8, or do a conversion on the WML files and then feed it to wml, > leaving the original WML files intact. > Any known issues on using UTF-8 in HTML? Obviously there are not many sites > that use it. > If we decide to do this we should test it on a few pages first to see what happens. Anyone willing to try this? devel/index.wml might be a good one to test since people looking at that will be more likely to have a clue.
We just need to be prepared to get a lot of complaints if it doesn't work and switch it back quickly. -- James (Jay) Treacy [EMAIL PROTECTED]
