> None, that's the point. If you see an image w/o any description (like
> swirl or logo) you don't know, for sure, if that logo is something you
> want or should look at. All you know is it's "something" With a
> description, you can think,
The ALT tag is *not* meant to describe the image. It's there to be used *in
place of* the image. A logotype's function is to convey information on who
runs the business, it is not a means to itself.
Your description of the image ("Swirl logo") should go in the TITLE
attribute, not the ALT attribute. The same for links, this would perfectly
correct:
<a href="miaow.html" title="My cat in the bathtub">Wet pussy - XXX!</a>
which would make a graphical browser pop up the string "My cat in the
bathtub" whenever I point to that link, or step my text-mode browser over
the link. Similarly
<img src="debian.jpg" alt="Debian" title="Swirl logotype">
is replaced by "Debian" in text-only mode, and the text "Swirl logotype"
should be popped up if I point to the image in a graphical browser, or step
my text-mode browser over the image, or request verbose information or
whatever.
(The first scenario, <a title> is supported at least by Opera).
--
\\//
peter - http://www.softwolves.pp.se/
- and God said: nohup make World >& World.log &
