Adam P. Harris wrote:
> Martin Schulze <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> > > However, a list of common popular licenses that have been
> > > examined and are known to qualify would be a good thing, as long as
> > > no claim is made about correctness or completeness which may open us
> > > up to liability.
>
> > I've attached such a list.
>
> I wish that you indicated some more detail and gotchas with licenses,
> even MPL, etc. See below.
Please add them yourself and give the listmasters more ideas. I'm not
the listmaster and I have other stuff to do. When I want to get things
done the maximum that I can do is to give appropriate advice.
Regards,
Joey
--
All language designers are arrogant. Goes with the territory...
-- Larry Wall
