On Saturday 11 July 2009 22:40:15 Steve Langasek wrote: > On Thu, Jul 09, 2009 at 09:19:33PM +0100, Lesley Binks wrote: > > > Certainly the group has been coasting for a while, which isn't a > > > problem by itself - but if it's now leading people to concede the main > > > mailing lists to people who are behaving inappropriately, I think > > > that's counterproductive. > > > > Even though I am currently unemployed and awaiting an operation, there > > is no way I could keep up with all > > the Debian mailing lists. I try to keep up with the low traffic on > > this one but even so do miss topics here. > > I try to keep up with the debian-perl and debian-devel lists but feel > > I also miss topics there too. > > Which would you consider to be the main Debian lists(s) to pay > > attention to and why do you think behaviour on those lists is > > inappropriate? > > For Debian development, debian-devel is the main general-purpose list that > I was thinking of. debian-project may also qualify. > > I, personally, *don't* think the behavior on those lists is inappropriate > > (in the sense that we're discussing here), I was only reacting to this: > > >> I think I am happier if we have our own 'quarter' where we can make it > > >> absolutely clear > > >> certain topics stuff are not welcome, nor tolerated and at least have > > >> the expectation that we won't need to waste our time > > >> explaining alternative viewpoints > > My point is that the kinds of topics that aren't tolerated on debian-women > shouldn't be tolerated on debian-devel either, and I am very concerned that > people not let debian-devel deteriorate on the grounds that debian-women is > "good enough".
I thought that the inappropriate behaviour referred to was on Debian-user? Lisi -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-women-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
