On 2005-07-20, Hanna M. Wallach <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> I'm interested in any feedback people might have. Some starting >> questions might be: >> >> * Why do you think there are few women participating in SPI? > > Good question. I've been thinking about SPI a lot lately, and have > been also been wondering about why there are so few women > participating in SPI. The conclusion I came to is that the situation > is largely one of perception.
[ snip ] > at that point that I would very much enjoy getting more involved in > SPI, but had always assumed that it just wasn't an option because I > wasn't one of the people who'd got involved in free software way back > when. I think this perception largely stems from the fact that when I > think of SPI, I tend to think of a group of people all of whom have > years of experience and a great deal of knowledge relating to free > software. In constrast, the majority of women who participate in the Good observation, and this is possibly one of SPI's problems, actually... > Thinking about this further, and now having read your mail, I realise > that my perception of SPI is probably wrong, but I wonder how many > other women involved in the free software also see it as such. Perhaps > trying to address this perception would encourage more women to > participate in SPI? OK. I'll just toss out a few thoughts here and maybe at some point I can boil it down to something more coherent to post on the website. First off, just a bit of background. Some years back, Debian realized that it ought to have some sort of legal presence to do useful things like own machines and copyrights. So, Software in the Public Interest, Inc. was created. SPI is a registered US non-profit organization, which means, among other things, that American donors can receive deductions from their taxes for giving money. SPI was envisioned as an organization that wouldn't be Debian-specific, but could also help out with other projects. In its early days, SPI was involved with Gnome, among other things. So what does SPI do? Most of our time is spent handling financial matters. All monetary donations to Debian go through SPI and are managed by SPI. The Debian project has control over how they are spent, but SPI officers manage the bank accounts and sign the checks (cheques for you non-us folks). SPI also has to take care of various legal items, such as maintaining our non-profit status, filing appropriate legal documents, etc. SPI also is involved with working with the Debian trademarks. We occasionally have been involved when someone has misappropriated a Debian trademark. We are also involved with registering the Debian trademarks in different jurisdictions worldwide. Debian isn't the only project that SPI works with, though it is by far the largest and most time-consuming. Let me just pick a few other examples and describe how SPI works with them. The OFTC IRC network (www.oftc.net) is a SPI member project. OFTC has no cashflow, but their constitution mandates that SPI run their elections to ensure fairness, and (if memory serves), SPI would arbitrate in any serious leadership disputes. Drupal (popular web portal/blog software) and wxWidgets (cross-platform GUI toolkit) have both recently joined SPI. We haven't had much interaction with them to date, though we did handle the banking aspects of a recent wxWidgets fund drive. So, what does it take to participate in SPI? First, perhaps I should say what you do *not* need to have to participate in SPI. You don't need to be a Debian developer, a programmer, or even to have an association with Debian. (SPI's secretary, David Graham, isn't a programmer and doesn't really work with Debian much). You don't even need to be involved with any SPI member project, though it helps. You don't need to have a great deal of computer science experience, though most people will expect SPI participants to be able to handle e-mail, web, and at least understand what ssh and a command-lines are about. So you'll notice that most current SPI members have all these unnecessary qualities in abundance ;-) What we *do* need are people that: * Are responsible, dedicated, and detail-oriented * Value Free Software and want to see it continue to succeed Extra plusses, for people that wish to be on committees or the board, would include time to devote to SPI on a regular basis. Any legal or accounting knowledge is extremely helpful to us, as very few of us have any such background. (Though it's obviously not required). So what are SPI's weaknesses? Anyone that wants to participate in SPI should know a bit about SPI's history, which is rather checkered. SPI's main problem through the years, and even up to today, has been lack of volunteer time. We just don't have enough people willing to spend enough time with SPI. We are in a much better position now than even 1 year ago, and far better than 3 years ago, but there is still need for more help in many areas. At various times in SPI's history, it had trouble even getting enough board members together to hold regular board meetings. Several years ago, there was a very public dispute with OSI over the Open Source trademark, resulting in several SPI board members resigning and moving to the OSI board. Up until just recently, we've had a series of treasurers that were very slow or even just completely uncommunicative for long periods of time. It often feels that, even though SPI has been around for about 8 years, it's just now learning how to walk. We're still recovering from the consequences of the past, particularly in the financial area. (We were never defrauded, but there is a huge backlog of paperwork that needs to be processed.) We've finally mustered the support to hire professional help in this area. How do you get involved with SPI? Similar to other Free Software projects -- find something that interests you and start working on it. Here are some examples: * Interested in research and facts? We have a number of tasks in this area, such as making sure all past resolutions enacted by the board are listed on the website, noting which clauses in old resolutions have been superceded by later ones, figuring out exactly who is on our different committees and why, etc. * HTML work? Our website needs updating in several areas. Many things are just out of date. * Translation? We try to make the website (www.spi-inc.org) available in as many languages as possible. * Procedure or policy? Our bylaws have a number of problems. We've got a draft of suggestions to fix them, but haven't had anyone to stick with it and shepherd the changes through the process. (At least not in the past year or so). This is a good job for any analytical mind (a lot of programmers or debian-legal participants would do well here). * Bookkeeping? Our financial folks are *always* looking for help. Branden is still our deputy treasurer, mainly because nobody else has volunteered. * Recruitment? Our membership committee has never really done this. * Working with different people/groups? We don't really have good communication with most of our smaller member projects. Somebody that volunteers to keep in contact them, and relay information in both directions, would be great. * Management of a non-profit? Our next scheduled Board elections will be in July 2006. There's nothing to say that you must be involved with SPI before running for the Board, but most recent people to be elected to the Board have come on that way (myself included). So there's the "quick" overview :-) Feel free to ask if you have any questions. -- John -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
