On Sun, 6 Mar 2005, Erinn Clark wrote: > * Christian Perrier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005:03:06 09:19 +0100]: [...] > > The real location should probably be discussed with the debian-www > > mailing list contributors as well as other technical implications. I'm > > pretty sure you'll find there very valuable input...probably by people > > you already know by some other means..:-) > > Hmm, I guess we should prepare to battle just in case...
I don't think we will have to battle for it, as you may have guessed I'm one of the website contributors (mainly translation and consultants page), though. > > IMHO, the d-w project has now reached a sufficiently mature activity > > for being part of the "official" web site. Of course, this is only my > > personal opinion and further discussion is required, especially with > > the web site team members. > > I agree that it's sufficiently mature, but I think we may potentially lose > some control over it if it's on the main website. I'm not very > knowledgeable about how easy it is to edit stuff and so forth. Can anyone > comment? Well, anyone with CVS access to the website would be able to change things. If someone changes something that is clearly not acceptable, I'm sure he will loose his/her CVS access, though. > > Doing so could probably open a new door to give women an opportunity > > to give their contribution to the project : I bet that some would > > first work on the d-w part....then slowly begin to contribute to the > > general web site. IIRC, several women in the project have good web > > site design skills. > > That seems to be the general path currently, yeah. Of course anyone who will contribute to the site can ask CVS access and will normally get it. See http://people.debian.org/~joey/misc/webwml.html. Cheers Luk