Holger Levsen wrote: > Nope, it's not: > > $ dpkg --compare-versions 1.4.0-dev+svn2484 lt 1.4.0-1 ; echo $? > 1 > $ dpkg --compare-versions 1.4.0-dev+svn2484 gt 1.4.0-1 ; echo $? > 0 > > Please use 1.4.0~dev+svn2484, so that we can upload 1.4.0-1 if we want to :-) > > Hmm, 1.4.0~svn2481-1 is even better or 1.4.0~dev+svn2484-1... >
Thanks for noticing :), I've changed the name to 1.4.0~svn2481-1. > > Just to be clear: you committed to trunk or did you modify trunk by means of > debian/patches/ ? I committed the non-debian specific changes to trunk, not through patches. I spoke to Nicolai, and he said that it's ok to fix these kind of trivial issues (such as http://munin.projects.linpro.no/changeset/2471) directly in trunk, and its even OK for not such trivial issues as he's looking at commits and will keep an eye to make sure everything is in order. I think this is the best way, as then we don't need so many patches on top of the orig.tar.gz, and the rest non-debian munin users will benefit from the fixes as well. > IMO we should leave this (lintian warnings) as they are, as these are issues > we/upstream need to fix. Changing the location from /var/www > to /srv/www/munin or such is something I would really like to see fixed for > squeeze, but I'm not really sure what is the best location. Maybe we should > start a thread on debian-devel@ to gather information+opinions how other > packages handle that. OK, I'll leave /var/www/munin as is until we're sure of what we want to do about it. > >> W: munin: executable-not-elf-or-script ./usr/share/munin/VeraMono.ttf > > debian/rules should delete that file and we should use this font from the > proper package already in Debian. I guess debian has the same VeraMono.ttf in the package: http://packages.debian.org/sid/ttf-dejavu (although the name is a bit different - DejaVuSansMono.ttf). I've opened bug http://bugs.debian.org/548508 for this issue. and committed a patch to fix this in experimental. Regards, Tom Feiner
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
