Your message dated Wed, 26 Aug 2009 13:54:12 -0500
with message-id <200908261354.13228.geiss...@debian.org>
and subject line Re: Review of the copyright file of
readahead-fedora_1.5.0-1.dsc.
has caused the Debian Bug report #535025,
regarding ITP: readahead-fedora -- Fedora's implementation of readahead to
preload boot process files
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
535025: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=535025
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Raphael Geissert <atom...@gmail.com>
Package: readahead-fedora
Homepage: https://fedorahosted.org/readahead/
License: GPLv2+
Description: Fedora's implementation of readahead to preload boot process
files
"readahead" is the term used to refer to a tool that preloads files
used during the boot process to make the system boot faster, therefore
reducing the time spent reading from the disk.
.
This implementation of the tool provides the following features:
* It can take multiple lists of files to be preloaded, and sort them
according to their position on the disk.
* It preloads the inode tables of ext2 file systems.
* It opens the files without making the system update their access
time, therefore avoiding extra disk writes.
* It uses a lightweight monitoring daemon.
Cheers,
--
Raphael Geissert - Debian Maintainer
www.debian.org - get.debian.net
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: readahead-fedora
Source-Version: 1.5.0-1
Hi Charles,
On Saturday 22 August 2009 03:50:28 Charles Plessy wrote:
> user debian-le...@lists.debian.org
> usertags 535025 one-copyright-review
> thanks
>
> Dear Raphaƫl,
>
> In the hope of speeding up and strenghtening the processing of NEW I had a
> look at your package. The rationale is explained in the proposal in the
> following wiki page: http://wiki.debian.org/CopyrightReview
>
> Fortunately, I have not found any problem with your copyright file :)
I forgot to thank you for the review back when you did it.
Just to let you know, ftp-masters seem to be recommending providing a url in
the copyright file where one can find the original source code.
And now closing the ITP since the package got ACCEPTED (but the .changes
didn't include the bug closer due to a bug in dpkg.)
Cheers,
--
Raphael Geissert - Debian Developer
www.debian.org - get.debian.net
--- End Message ---