Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Stefano Zacchiroli <z...@debian.org>
* Package name : python-repoze.who-plugins Version : 20090530 Upstream Author : Various athors * URL : http://pypi.python.org/pypi?%3Aaction=search&term=repoze.who&submit=search * License : BSD-derived (http://www.repoze.org/LICENSE.txt) Programming Lang: Python Description : authentication framework for Python WSGI applications - plugins collection repoze.who is an identification and authentication framework for arbitrary Python WSGI applications; it acts as WSGI middleware and is inspired by Zope 2's Pluggable Authentication Service (PAS). . This package contains a collection of plugins for repoze.who, in particular: . * repoze.who-friendlyform - developer-friendly forms * repoze.who-plugins.sa - SQLAlchemy integration * repoze.who-testutil - test utilities for repoze.who applications * repoze.who.plugins.ldap - LDAP authentication * repoze.who.plugins.openid - login via OpenID * repoze.who.plugins.recaptcha - server-side recaptcha implementation This package will contain _a collection of_ plugins for Python repoze.who. A sampling of them can be seen at http://pypi.python.org/pypi?%3Aaction=search&term=repoze.who&submit=search . A core part of them is needed as a dependency for TurboGears2. The reason why I'm proposing a collection package (i.e., a source package with more than one upstream) is that, taken individually, the plugins are about 20/30 Kb and I fear polluting the archive with too many small packages. In this case, I consider the choice of the collection package worth, but it will carry the usual drawbacks of multiple upstream packages. If people, especially from the Debian Python Modules team, have arguments to prefer several source packages (I will need at least 4 for TG2), please let me know. Cheers. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
