Damyan Ivanov <d...@debian.org> wrote: > [Please Cc me on replies. Thanks] > Most of the code is licensed under "the same terms as Perl itself", [...] > In addition to that, some icons are licensed under LGPL-3+, and some > more icons are licensed under GPL-2. > > From how I understand it, if we choose GPL-2 for the main code, that > still leaves the combination of GPL-2 (code and some .png icons) and > LGPL-3+ (.png icons). Is such aggregation OK?
If it's mere aggregation, I believe each stays under their own licence. Hope that helps, -- MJR/slef My Opinion Only: see http://people.debian.org/~mjr/ Please follow http://www.uk.debian.org/MailingLists/#codeofconduct -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
