Your message dated Sun, 28 Dec 2008 18:49:38 -0500
with message-id <1230508178.11795.20.ca...@workhorse.home.net>
and subject line Re: Bug#506224: ITP: mpi-defaults -- Meta-packages depending
on appropriate MPI -dev and -bin packages for each platform
has caused the Debian Bug report #506224,
regarding ITP: mpi-defaults -- Meta-packages depending on appropriate MPI -dev
and -bin packages for each platform
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
506224: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=506224
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Package name: mpi-defaults
Version: 0.1
Author: Debian Science Team <debian-science-maintain...@lists.alioth.debian.org>
License: Undetermined
This new source package will produce two binary meta-packages:
default-mpi-dev and default-mpi-bin which depend on libopenmpi-dev and
openmpi-bin respectively on the platforms where they are available, and
lam4-dev and lam-runtime on the others. A third default-mpi-dbg might
also depend on libopenmpi-dbg, though there is no corresponding lam
package.
Background:
http://lists.debian.org/debian-science/2008/10/msg00097.html
-Adam
--
GPG fingerprint: D54D 1AEE B11C CE9B A02B C5DD 526F 01E8 564E E4B6
Engineering consulting with open source tools
http://www.opennovation.com/
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On Sun, 2008-12-28 at 00:47 +0100, Manuel Prinz wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 26, 2008 at 01:01:17AM -0500, Adam C Powell IV wrote:
> > This was just accepted! Yay! I'm now wishist bugging all of my
> > packages to use it, and will start uploading with hypre tonight.
>
> Nice! Thanks for your work!
>
> This ITP was not closed via the changelog. Should we close it in the next
> upload or by hand?
D'oh! Closing now by hand. (No need to use "fixed" with a version
because there's only one.) Thanks.
-Adam
--
GPG fingerprint: D54D 1AEE B11C CE9B A02B C5DD 526F 01E8 564E E4B6
Engineering consulting with open source tools
http://www.opennovation.com/
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
--- End Message ---
