On Tue, Apr 29, 2008 at 04:01:59PM +0200, Gürkan Sengün wrote: > On Tue, April 29, 2008 09:29, Gürkan Sengün wrote: > >Dear Salsaman, > > > >Could you relicense all of your software parts of lives into > >GNU GPL v3, or 2, or 2.1, whatever you like best? > > > >That'll make inclusion of lives into Debian (and Ubuntu) a lot > >easier. > > > >Thank you, > >Gürkan > > Hi, > all of the LiVES software is licensed under the GPL v3 or later. The only > exception is weed.h, weed.c, weed-utils.c which will become a library > under the LGPL v3 or later. If you find any source files which are > incorrectly licensed, please let me know and I will correct this. > > [...] > > I will take a look at the debian/copyright file and update it as necessary.
Hi, Any progress on this? I'd really like to see an OGG-capable editor in Debian, and Lives looks like a good option. If you need more details, this was the response from FTP team (as posted in the bug log): <quote> Additionally your debian/copyright file is incomplete and misses (C)holders/license data. You have to include all such differences. Like all of libOSC/*, some of the icons. And next, it includes a mixture of GPL/LGPL v2/v2.1 and v3. Now you need to check if all v2/v2.1 ones are "or any later". If not it is undistributable. </quote> > RFX.spec is a documentation file which documents a standard. I am happy to > change the license for this to whatever you recommend (what does debian > recommend for standards ?). GPL or LGPL would be fine. -- Robert Millan The DRM opt-in fallacy: "Your data belongs to us. We will decide when (and how) you may access your data; but nobody's threatening your freedom: we still allow you to remove your data and not access it at all." -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
