On Saturday 21 June 2008 11:38:07 Roberto C. Sánchez wrote: > On Sat, Jun 21, 2008 at 07:34:59PM +0200, Holger Levsen wrote: > > Hi, > > > > On Saturday 21 June 2008 15:52, Alexander Wirt wrote: > > > I'm still not that sure if its a good idea to add a non-offical > > > debian repo keyring into the archive... > > > > Nobody is forced to install it?! > > > > And AFAICS we regulary recommend backports.org to users, who need newer > > software. So I think it should be in. > > But backports.org is still unofficial. If it were permitted, then what > would happen when other unofficial repository maintainers want to > package their repository keyrings? Will those be allowed or disallowed?
Maybe a common, group maintained, debian-unofficial-keyring package? -- Wesley J. Landaker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <xmpp:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> OpenPGP FP: 4135 2A3B 4726 ACC5 9094 0097 F0A9 8A4C 4CD6 E3D2
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
