Jose Luis Rivas Contreras wrote: > Cristian Greco wrote: > [some text missing] >>> Also, what is the status on renaming the current libtorrent to >>> libtorrent-rakshasha to avoid confusion? >> As I know, there have been no further discussion about this. > > Hi, I as the maintainer of libtorrent would like to say that I don't > believe there's some need for renaming the library, is not that if you > write `aptitude install libtorrent' the rakshasa libtorrent will be > installed (it's called libtorrent10), there's libtorrent-ruby too and > isn't conflicting with libtorrent rakshasa name so there's no really > need, I believe. > > Regards.
That makes sense. How about a change in the short description, instead? apt-cache search libtorrent should make it clear that it's the rakshasha one. Thanks, Scott Ritchie -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]