Hi Raphael, On Tuesday 12 February 2008 02:01, you wrote: > > I saw your mail to this bug, but I consider QA work team work :-) > Sure it is :)
Cheers :)
(I didn't really think (at all) you were objecting to this, I just had to make
that point :)
> But if you re-read the bug report you will see that the necessary
> changes to fix it aren't many (but I should probably reconsider that
> because of /proc not existing in newer kernels, starting with .24?)
Yet, noone has done it for four years. Also I dont think it would be that
easy... and anyway: IPX is mostly dead and those still using it have probably
old boxes running it already...
> I've already requested its removal from stable :)
Then I really dont understand why you wait with removing it from sid. Anybody
interested to pick it up can get it from various archives...
> I don't see any real problem on keeping this report a few more days on
> wnpp to give people the opportunity to see it is up for adoption.
They had this chance for 4 years.
> IMO some people prefer to fix an existing package than to 'Debianise'
> from scratch, hence my desire to keep it a few more days.
> But if you believe it really makes no sense at all to keep the report
> open on wnpp feel free to reassign it to ftp.debian.org with a correct
> removal request subject and CC me so I update packages-actions.txt
I'll leave this to you :-)
regards,
Holger
pgpNJwAMxYA55.pgp
Description: PGP signature
