On Sun, Jan 20, 2008 at 11:15:09PM +0100, Guus Sliepen wrote: > On Sun, Jan 20, 2008 at 11:18:14PM +0200, Peter Antoniac wrote: > > > > - Missing and incorrect Conflicts: entries in the control file for Debian. > > > > If you mean the Conflicts with 11 and 13, we don't want those two packages > > to > > conflict. The SO 22 can work with 13 or 11 without problems... > > I also added Conflicts with 20, because some people might have installed > that one from experimental, and the -utils package has to Conflict with > the old -examples package.
I'm guessing that there is a minor misunderstanding here. The conflicts are only for the -dev packages. The library packages themself don't conflict. But I have to wonder a few things: - Why do you need 2 source packages for libdc1394? Do you think migrating from the current "13" to "22" will take a long time? Did things change alot in the API? We only seem to have 10 packages in unstable that build depend on libdc1394 so I don't see why we need 2 source packages for that. - Why do you want to embed the current soname in things like the -dev and -doc packages? (It might be related to the first question.) - Is there really a need to have 2 "utils" binary packages? They even conflict with each other, and the "22" doesn't seem to make any sense in this case. Kurt -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
