"John H. Robinson, IV" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Joerg Jaspert wrote:
>> There are *way* better MTAs [than qmail] out there that dont need >> tons of patches applied just to fulfill basic requirements for a MTA. > No, there are not. Is the version that is proposed to be packaged patched to reject mail at the SMTP level for unknown users rather than accept mail and bounce it later? qmail in its default operational mode is a spam reflector and hence broken by design, and shouldn't be accepted into Debian. However, perhaps this has been fixed by the community since djb's last release? -- Russ Allbery ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
