On 17/04/07 at 01:19 +0200, Daniel Leidert wrote: > Am Montag, den 16.04.2007, 23:30 +0100 schrieb Neil Williams: > > > thanks > > > > > > I'm going to adopt these packages as part of the Debian XML/SGML > > > group. Let's see, if we can put the latest version into Etch. > > > > > > Regards, Daniel > > > > Umm, Etch is out and this bug is still open. > > > > Any news on packaging the updated upstream release? > > Yes, the recognition, that the build systems of the version in Debian > and the latest upstream version are different and that there was no way > to make the update happen for Etch. I locally "compiled" the package > with xsltproc. But for a fully featured update, a new docbook-xsl-java > package is necessary, because several elements are not fully supported > by the XSLT processors we have in Debian. But the source for this > package was not yet officially released seprataely and I would like to > use this separate source. Discussion with upstream, respectively Michael > Smith, has already been done. Making a pdf also fails atm because of > bugs in the involved packages. And at least, it may also be possible to > simply ship the ready-to-use html files instead of self-creating these > files to workaround the above "issues". > > If this is just a ping, if I'm active, then: Yes, I'm still actively > working to solve this bug.
Hi Daniel, Have you made some progress on this stuff? docbook-xsl-saxon is now in Debian, so it shouldn't be a blocker anymore. I was going through very old orphaned packages, and this package is in the top 10... Lucas -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
