On Tue, Jun 19, 2007 at 06:19:15PM +0100, Marcos Marado wrote: > On Tuesday 19 June 2007 18:00, Rainer Dorsch wrote: >> Am Dienstag, 19. Juni 2007 18:11 schrieb Marcos Marado: > >> On Tuesday 19 June 2007 16:55, Rainer Dorsch wrote: > > >> Am Dienstag, 19. Juni 2007 15:00 schrieben Sie: > > > >> Are the Etch packages built from the -1 or -2 version of 1.17? The > > > >> main change was using the default g++ instead of the g++-3.4 > > > >> specified by upstream.
> > >> -1 > >> Can you please package -2 to see if the problem still happens? >> Sure, I can. But as I understood Paul, this is even further away from the >> upstream compile (Ubuntu packages), because they recommend the gcc-3.4. > Yes, you're right... Paul, can you please explain why did you change that? Mainly because I'd had some feedback that gcc-4 would build it fine, and I was hoping it was going to be a faster build. I've not seen the texture problem you're describing with either build though, so I'm at a bit of a loss. To confirm the results of build-alternatives, simply comparing the dependancies of the resulting binary debs should show up any differences in the selected alternatives. eg. dpkg-deb -I slviewer_*.deb | grep Depends -- Paul "TBBle" Hampson, [EMAIL PROTECTED] Shorter .sig for a more eco-friendly paperless office.
pgpD9gbrCLCZK.pgp
Description: PGP signature
