Alle sabato 26 maggio 2007, JMC Alonzo ha scritto: > Should rails-el package be named emacs-rails? The upstream project and > tarball is named as emacs-rails and it would be confusing if the package is > named as rails-el.
I don't know enough well about policies, just had seen there are many minor/major mode packages which are called in that manner. > In any case, I'm willing to cooperate and perhaps co-maintain if that's ok? > I build my packages using hg-buildpackage and I already have a version > controlled upstream and debian source for the current release. If you want I > can put it up somewhere and coordinate things there? Sadly, I'm not going to package emacs-rails, that's the reason why I just filed a RFP bug. However I'm slowly learning about packaging and maintainership, so feel free to contact me in the future (after all, I like RubyOnRails and sometimes do use Emacs(en)!), even beyond testing purposes, of course. Cheers, -- Luca Brivio -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]