Do you mean I should just renumber the package version from 2.1a to 1.9 or what? I think the versioning schema for this project is very bizzare. Also I think it is not so important for experimental packages :)
2007/5/7, Kurt Roeckx <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
On Mon, May 07, 2007 at 06:18:57PM +0200, Piotr Roszatycki wrote: > 2007/5/7, Florian Weimer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > >* Mike Hommey: > > > >> Why not package this as libtool and upload to experimental ? > > > >It would be impossible to build-depend on it. This may or may not be > >a good thing. > > I think the including libtool from cvs snapshot to the unstable > distribution might be good for its development process. More people > will use it and then more people will report the bugs. > > Nevertheless, I'm uloading the packages as libtool/experimental. My > packages are located at http://people.debian.org/~dexter/libtool/ Please use a version of 1.9. It's not because upstream now calls this 2.1a that it won't be released as 2.0. Kurt
-- .''`. Piotr Roszatycki : :' : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] `. `' mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] `-
