On Mon, Apr 09, 2007 at 11:59:02PM +0200, Arnaud Fontaine wrote: -> >>>>> "Titus" == Titus Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: -> -> -> Actually, I have just tried that, however the current version of -> -> beautifulsoup in Debian is 3.x whereas mechanize only support -> -> beautifulsoup 2.x ATM. So, I wonder how I could fix this issue, -> -> any idea? -> -> Titus> I think John Lee would probably be resistant to ripping out -> Titus> BS altogether from his distribution. How much of a problem -> Titus> is it to simply keep it in there? It's not generally -> Titus> accessible, so it wouldn't interfere with anything. -> -> Actually, BeautifulSoup is not included in mechanize source tree. -> Therefore, if we want to use python-mechanize instead of other_packages -> module, it will fail because mechanize imports BeautifulSoup module -> which is included in python-beautifulsoup 3.x.
Ahh, you must be working with an older version. The latest version of mechanize includes BeautifulSoup as _beautifulsoup. (That's an accomodation that I can make in twill as well, if necessary.) cheers, --titus -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
